Category: Reports

  • Goalie prospect insight of the Month

    By Jean-François Rioux 

    X: @Rickyjf

    Danai Shaiikov 

    Gatineau Olympiques, QMJHL

    In this series, instead of simply pitching the goalie with the top numbers, I’ll highlight one goalie prospect who stood out to me in my viewings in the last month.

    In his first 4 starts since moving to North America), Danai Shaiikov caught my attention early in my viewings. His speed and agility in the crease were evident, as he covered ground well, reset quickly to position after initial shots and showed a high compete level. He started the year strong with 3 wins and posting a 2.05 GAA and .912 Sv%.

    Strengths

    His lateral movement and ability to reset after a shot are among his most reliable tools in his positioning. He gave himself a chance on rebound opportunities and scrambles. He stayed very active in his crease making quick and crisp adjustments to set him up square to the puck.He also challenges shooters, cuts angles, and doesn’t shy off his crease. That mindset can force shooters into uncomfortable looks with rare free space to place the puck.

    danai_shaiikov_-_2nd_period_5_57_-_6_13.mp4


    Weaknesses 

    His aggressive style sometimes comes at a cost: he can lose track of precise angles or let gaps open up, particularly on tight or deceptive plays, complicating his save selection. Also, his strong pushes when sliding make him overcommit on some plays, so the recovery can be difficult, even with above average speed and quickness.

    danai_shaiikov_-_1st_period_20_56_-_21_9.mp4


    Projection & Potential

    I see Shaiikov as an overager draftable prospect for the 2026 draft as he has the athletic profile and size to draw NHL interest. I’ll be following him up all season to see his progression in identified weaknesses, more notably if his aggressiveness can be balanced with more structural discipline.

  • Goalie of the week spotlight

    By Jean-François Rioux 

    X: @Rickyjf

    Dmitri Ivchenko 

    Omskie Yastreby, MHL

    In this series, instead of simply pitching the goalie with the top numbers, I’ll highlight one goalie prospect who stood out to me in my viewings in the last month.

    Dmitri Ivchenko is off to an excellent start this MHL season with the Omskie Yastreby. After three starts, he remains undefeated, boasting a 1.98 GAA and a .938 save percentage. His main strengths are immediately noticeable in every viewing :  a tall, powerful goaltender who moves with both speed and purpose. Yet, the more I watched him, the more I realized there’s something truly special about his game. That’s why he earns the spotlight this week.

    Strengths

    His speed and power through crease movements are undeniable. He pushes and slides effortlessly to beat passes and square up to plays on his feet. However, what stood out most was his ability to read the play and make intelligent, timely adjustments. He consistently recognized when to challenge on rushes and when to hold back and tilt his body to react to a pass. This level of play recognition, combined with his exceptional mobility, makes him extremely difficult to beat.


    Weaknesses 

    He needs to better utilize his 6-foot-4 frame to take command of his crease. At times, he becomes vulnerable on screens and net-front scrambles, struggling to maintain optimal positioning and upper-body structure to face shots or track pucks effectively from the point.


    Projection & Potential

    At this point in the season, Ivchenko has shown a skill set that should generate significant interest heading into the 2026 NHL Draft. His speed, athleticism, and play-reading ability are all highly valuable traits that project well to the next level. However, Ivchenko’s technical fundamentals and mechanics remain somewhat raw. He’ll need to refine and polish those areas as the season progresses, doing so could firmly place him among the first goaltenders selected in the draft.

  • Gavin McKenna Headlines Top Prospects In the NCAA

    Gavin McKenna Headlines Top Prospects In the NCAA

    NCAA Draft Eligible Top Prospects Spotlight


    As hockey season begins in many leagues around North America, prospects eligible for
    the 2026 NHL Entry Draft look to put their best foot forward to start the year. Each month, we
    will cover each of the six players currently playing NCAA hockey and how they rank in this
    year’s draft. Here is the report from our first month, October:


    1: Gavin McKenna – LW, Penn State

    • No surprises here, as McKenna rightfully takes number one. The hype around him is
      real, and his abilities in the offensive zone could transform an NHL offense. I also love
      the decision to go to the NCAA from McKenna, as while his production will dip and he
      will struggle more often than he would in the WHL, it will pay off for him in the long run,
      as the NCAA has a great track record of development. He plays on a top line in the
      NCAA, playing over 21 minutes a night in his four games so far. He is trusted at a high
      level, and that is mainly due to his high-end offensive traits. He is quick, and his agility
      and lateral movement are excellent. He is best off the rush, using creative ways to work
      the puck into the slot and rip it into the net, or find a way to dish it to a teammate. His
      forecheck and defensive abilities need plenty of work, but that’s not why you draft him.
      His skill is just too high to pass up on in the offensive zone, and McKenna will likely be
      stapled to the number one spot on this list for the rest of the year, barring drastic
      changes.

    • 2: Keaton Verhoeff – RD, North Dakota
    • After an incredible year with the Victoria Royals, including 21 goals from the back end,
      Verhoeff decided to take his talents to North Dakota, something that will surely improve
      his development. He has great size at 6’4”, and uses it well for poke-checks and
      blocking zone-entries. He also collapses gaps incredibly quickly, most times using his
      size to pin an opposing player to the boards before the zone entry, and allows a
      teammate to retrieve the puck if he can’t do so himself. His biggest strength, however, is
      easily his shot. You don’t score 21 goals in the WHL as a 16-year-old defenseman with a
      sub-par shot, and Verhoeff is certainly no exception. He takes plenty of shots from the
      back-end, and when he has time to let one rip, there is a likely chance it hits twine. His
      first goal in a North Dakota uniform was just that, a rocket from behind the circles.
      Verhoeff isn’t perfect, though, and some of his inconsistencies bother me. First, his
      skating is not great. It isn’t a weakness necessarily, but he can at times be caught flat-
      footed and will flail trying to do quick crossovers to make up for it. He is a taller
      defenseman, so super smooth skating isn’t a dealbreaker, but it is noticeable. Second,
      he tends to be one of the first players to join the rush or head into the attacking zone.
      This is great for most offensive defenders, but that means he will likely need a defensive
      partner to balance him out, despite Verhoeff’s individual defense being solid. Those
      aren’t huge problems, but when you are projected as a future number one defender,
      small skating or defense issues will be amplified. One of the best things about Verhoeff,
      though, is his age. He is only 17 and has a July birthday, meaning by the time he turns
      18, he will have an entire NCAA season under his belt, one of the best development

    leagues, especially for defensemen. These issues I have with him may be entirely gone
    by the end of the season, or they may be his main issues. Verhoeff is definitely one to
    wait and see how he develops this year, but he will likely be a top-three pick in a loaded
    2026 class.
    3: Ilia Morozov** – C, Miami (OH)

    • Here is where we start branching out into lesser-known names; however, I doubt that will
      be true of Morozov for long. He has caught my eye so quickly that he will be the topic of
      the first prospect analysis article. Last year, he played for the Tri-City Storm of the
      USHL, putting up 11 goals and 22 points in 56 games, a good showing for the then 16-
      year-old. Now, at 17 with an August birthday, the incredibly young forward took the step
      up to the NCAA. As the youngest player in the league, he has made his presence known
      with 3 goals and 7 points in only four games for Miami Ohio. At 6’3”, he already has the
      size to be physical and protect the puck on his stick. He isn’t a player who excels with
      the puck on his stick, however. Almost any time his team enters the offensive zone,
      Morozov goes directly to the front of the net. But he is not inactive, constantly shifting or
      gliding behind the net to continue a cycle. He is not the best of the boards, but like
      Verhoeff, that makes sense with a 17-year-old in the NCAA, even if both are above 6
      feet. He has a quick release and specifically excels with his catch-and-release shot. He
      also has already shown a high motor at times, but he is inconsistent and will sometimes
      not push himself on a backcheck or forecheck. Not only is he inconsistent, but his
      skating is also an issue and he will need to improve if he wants to make the NHL.
      Overall, a fascinating package that could turn a lot of heads around hockey circles if he
      can continue to produce. He has already brought the Miami Ohio Hockey program to a
      better season than last year, as they have gone 4-0-0 to start the year, while they only
      won 3 games all of last year. If this young prospect can continue reviving an NCHC
      program as the top line center with great net-front skills, he may be a lot better than
      many know right now. I think at the very least he is a first-rounder, and if he continues to
      improve, he could creep into the top 15.

    • 4: Adam Valentini – LW, Michigan
    • Valentini has a lot of development ahead, but he could be really good if he can continue
      to grow his game. Another late-birthday 2008 (April), but chose to take the jump to the
      NCAA, and in 4 games already has 3 assists. You can see what made Valentini so good
      for the Chicago Steel last year, where he put up 17 goals and 39 points in 58 games, a
      very good performance in the USHL. Now at Michigan, you can see how his game is a
      bit less refined compared to others in the NCAA. But the skill level and talent are there;
      he just needs some fine-tuning. His small area skill is great; he can stickhandle quickly
      and in stride, he is a hound entering the zone, stick lifts and works around opponents,
      and tries to create a chance even when the play is seemingly broken up. But his
      defensive positioning, forechecking effort, and physical play all leave more to be desired.
      A lot of these issues can be worked out, and like all players on this list, it will be
      interesting to see how the coaching staff will develop him, especially one as good as

    Michigan’s. I think Valentini is also currently a first-round level prospect, and if he
    improves so should his draft stock.


    5: Landon Nycz – LD, Massachusetts

    • Landon Nycz is another player who I think is flying under the radar right now, but by draft
      day people will know who he is. Already logging around 15 minutes a night, he may only
      be the fifth option on the backend for the Minutemen, but he shows promise already. He
      has good size at 6’2”, and skates incredibly well for his size. His crossovers and
      transition skating is so fluid it looks second nature to Nycz. He normally begins the
      breakout for his team, can fake opponents in the defensive zone, and then find a seam
      pass to one side in the neutral zone to transition to offense. While he normally stays high
      to be the last man back, he will occasionally cycle in the offensive zone and drive
      towards the net to get a better chance. He also shoots the puck a ton, especially off
      feeds at the blue-line, resulting in Nycz’ first NCAA goal last week. He is noticeable
      responsible in the way he plays, and will battle net front to clear his crease. The lack of
      glaring issues is also a large plus for Nycz. He is already 18 as a October birthday, but
      to be a noticeable defenseman in the NCAA at 18 is no easy feat. I see him slotting into
      a second round pick come draft time, as his mix of skating, size, and high level of
      competition in the NCAA make him appealing. If he can keep up this pace this year, he
      is likely an early day two selection.

    • 6: Lincoln Kuehne – RD, Arizona State
    • Not a ton to say about Kuehne, although he is a notable prospect in his own right. He is
      a 6’2”, defense-first defenseman who is currently shoring up the bottom pair for Arizona
      State. He was at the United States National Development Program last year, where he
      put up 3 assists and a +8 rating in 27 games. He uses his size well, effectively
      eliminating rush chances against the boards. He closes gaps quickly and doesn’t give
      oncoming forwards any room. This is effective; however, higher-level forwards will be
      able to work around this method, so he will need to advance his defensive technique to
      get to the next level. He skates fairly well and uses it to reach pucks and close lanes
      quickly. He hasn’t put up any stats for ASU yet this year, but as a shutdown third-pair
      defenseman, no news means a job well done. I don’t know if Kuehne has a super high
      ceiling, but playing any role on a good ASU program in your draft year is a good sign.
      And if you want to develop a defenseman anywhere, it’s the NCAA. A big issue with him
      so far is his ice-time, as he currently ranks last on Arizona State with just over 11
      minutes a night on average. When you are playing less than most forwards as a
      defensemen, it may be cause for concern due to the lack of trust with the coach that
      shows. How he develops throughout the year will decide his draft ranking, as he has just
      not played enough at the NCAA level yet.

    It may be a little ridiculous to try and project where these players will go on draft night in
    nine months, but the exercise to more to express the level there are playing at over the course
    of the year. These 6 players all deserve a nod in some aspect, as playing college hockey in your

    draft year is impressive in itself. Im excited to keep covering them over the course of this year to
    see how they can grow their games, and where they do end up in the draft.

  • Vladislav Yermolenko

     2025-19-09 Niagara 1 @ Brampton 4 (OHL)

    Yermolenko’s defining trait is his hockey IQ. Every paths he takes in the crease seemed calculated and based on his reads. He consistently performed shoulder checks to identify threats in the zone, allowing him to plan his movements and arrive on angle without relying excessively on raw explosiveness. His glove hand was also impressive, catching pucks cleanly and without hesitation. That said, there are technical flaws in his game. His RVH seals are inconsistent, leaving gaps that shooters can exploit, which cost him a goal in this game. His T-pushes were also inefficient; rather than a clean, single push across the crease, he often used two smaller pushes, which slowed him down. Yermolenko’s intelligence will generate interest, but some of his mechanics could hold him back, as NHL teams place a premium on those skills. I’ll be following his development closely, as improvement in those areas could make him a more complete prospect.

  • Ryder Fetterolf

     2025-26-09 Ottawa 2 @ North Bay 1 (OHL)

    Fetterolf is a smaller goalie, but one who makes up for it with his overall fluidity while moving. His movements are crisp and decisive, whether skating on his feet or sliding in the butterfly. His speed in this viewing was above average, but he struggled with rebound control. Pucks often hit him hard, and he had difficulty absorbing them cleanly. He also tended to lose edge early and rely heavily on his butterfly. While this approach allowed him to seal the lower net effectively, it left him vulnerable on higher shots which is a particular concern given his smaller frame. Fetterolf will remain on my radar, but I’ll be looking for growth in his overall game to justify a mid-round projection in the 2026 draft.

  • Dmitri Borichev

     2025-26-09 Yaroslavl 1 @ Mamonty 2 (MHL)

    Borichev is a powerful goalie with a commanding presence in the crease. His lower-body strength makes him one of the most explosive goalies in this draft class. His first pushes,whether standing or from the butterfly, are extremely strong, allowing him to set quickly for shooters. His puck tracking projects as potentially elite, as he rarely lost sight of the puck. In this viewing, he handled rebounds and loose pucks cleanly, avoiding chaotic or desperate movements. However, his mechanics on recoveries and post-save movements need refinement. His speed to regain square positioning, upper-body structure, and hand placement while moving or sliding were inconsistent. These mechanical issues can be addressed with development and shouldn’t hold him back too much, especially if his tracking and rebound control remain in the elite tier.

  • Marek Skenlicka

     2025-20-09 Tri-City 3 @ Seattle 6 (WHL)

    Skenlicka is a goalie with a strong combination of size and speed. Using his 6-foot-4 frame to his advantage, he positions himself well and stays on angle with the puck. His speed is impressive for a goalie of his size. His pushes are crisp, and he transitions smoothly from RVH or butterfly into set positioning. That skill allows him to recover quickly after shots or broken plays in front of him. While his crease work was impressive overall, two concerns stood out. First, I felt he could have been more aggressive in his positioning. At times, he stayed too deep in the blue paint rather than challenging shooters. Given his size, squareness, and recovery ability, he has the tools to play more assertively. Second, he struggled with rebound control on low shots, leaving too many loose pucks in dangerous areas. To his credit, his strong tracking often allowed him to cover those rebounds quickly. With his size, technique, and speed, Skenlicka is one of the most intriguing goalie prospects for the 2026 draft.

  • Frantisek Poletin

     2025-12-09 Pelicans 5 @ Ilves U20 4 SO (U20 Finland)

    Poletin is a technically sound goalie who relies on positioning more than raw speed. He consistently stays on angle when tracking plays in the defensive zone and on rushes. He manages rebounds effectively, which limits the need for difficult recoveries. While his post-shot recoveries are technically well-executed, he lacks the explosiveness that could elevate his overall game. One area of concern is his upper-body work. His butterfly is tight and his low-shot tracking is strong, but he struggles more on high shots, especially glove side. His left hand tends to sit low and away from his body at knee height, which slows his reaction time. Poletin has many of the technical strengths to make him an intriguing 2026 draft option, but to rise in the rankings he will need to show more quickness and refine his tracking on higher shots.

  • Danai Shaiikov

     2025-19-09 Gatineau 5 @ Val-d’Or 3 (QMJHL)

    Shaiikov, a DY+1 goalie prospect, was a player I was eager to watch since his arrival in North America, and he did not disappoint. His speed immediately stood out. Quick on his feet, he covers ground well within his crease, and in this viewing his recovery skills looked elite. His quickness allowed him to reset his angles after the first shot with ease. Shaiikov is also a very active goalie who likes to challenge shooters. His feet and hands are constantly moving, whether he is upright or in the butterfly. However, that aggressiveness and constant activity sometimes left him vulnerable, as he occasionally lost control of his angles and seals, leading to goals against. In my opinion, with consistency this year, he could generate interest from NHL scouts. With his speed and quickness, he has the tools to be a candidate as an overager for the 2026 draft.

  • Vladimir Selivanov

     2025-19-09 Dynamo Moscow 1 @ MHK Spartak 3 (MHL)

    Selivanov is a goalie who blends strong technique with athleticism. He generates excellent power on his pushes, allowing him to arrive on angle and challenge shooters effectively. He rarely sets up late or off-balance. His positioning and puck tracking are both excellent, and he follows pucks into his body closely, making him very difficult to beat without a screen or lateral movement. However, I noticed a decline in focus and consistency when defensive-zone sequences dragged on and fatigue set in. At that point, Selivanov began giving up more dangerous rebounds and looked less sharp on recoveries. That being said, his overall skill set is nearly complete, and he should be considered among the early favorites to top preliminary goalie lists for the 2026 NHL Draft.