Blog

  • Demidov is Delivering for the Canadiens

    Why is everyone bullish on Canadiens’ rookie Ivan Demidov? His skill? Yes, because Demidov is one of the most exciting, skilled players to have landed on the shores of the island of Montreal in many years. But more than that, it’s the way he is being deployed because he is not confined to just a fourth line or marginal role. Martin St. Louis eases rookies into the lineup by focusing on their main skill set, in this case, Demidov’s offensive talent, and gives them more opportunities than a restrictive defensive role, a philosophy he has used before with other rookies such as Lane Hutson. He puts a priority on playing collectively, where players are expected to play a defensive scheme that is designed to launch a transitional play. This allows individuals to use their speed and offensive skills to stand out. This allows him to build their confidence while adding to their responsibilities and ice time incrementally, allowing them to minimize their errors while showcasing the skills that got them to the NHL. 

    Why is he seen as a Calder Trophy-calibre rookie? Because Demidov’s game has a natural flair. What becomes obvious as soon as he steps onto the ice is his excellent puck-handling skills. Demidov has an incredible set of hands, but it is his impressive level of puck control and creativity that has set him apart from most young players today.  

    He manages not only to maintain control even in tight areas or when being marked closely but he also manages to adapt quickly. He can change his angle of attack with some edgework or a punch turn. He can do this due to his confidence with the puck, which allows him to generate scoring opportunities seemingly out of thin air.  

    He is skilled at making controlled zone entries. His use of speed and puck-handling skills allows him to open lanes. He uses speed changes to create separation and has the confidence to attack the net immediately. While this play didn’t amount to a shot on net, it is a scoring chance he generated on what seemed to be a harmless rush.  

    While he will improve his top speed and first-step explosiveness as he adds strength, it is Demidov’s skating mechanics that are his main strength in this area. He is proficient with the “10-2 skating style” (also called a mohawk), where he uses a heel-to-heel motion to turn by shifting weight from one foot to the other, with the “10” and “2” referring to the feet’s position in a clock-like face. He is also adept with the use of the “anchor point” as a stabilization technique, where the top hand is kept near the hip while the player uses the heel of the foot on which he wants to change direction. His deceptive edgework, offensive vision and his unpredictability keep his opponents on their heels, and that provides him an additional split second that allows him to find seams most players wouldn’t, which is another attribute that has set him apart.  

    Demidov displays several skills all in this one play. He joins the transitional attack, building speed up in the neutral zone. He makes a quick reaction to the broken play, a missed pass to Carrier at centre. He was able to corral the bouncing puck by reaching back behind his body and bringing it forward under control, all while retaining speed and keeping his head up the entire sequence. He then forces the defender back over the blue line because of that speed, allowing for a controlled zone entry. Once he draws Dunn in, he identifies Newhook streaking to the net. Once he sees Dunn go off balance, Demidov makes a hard stop, takes one step inwards to reset himself, turns in and places a hard, accurate pass through traffic, to an open Newhook who only needs to have his stick on the ice to redirect the puck into the net 

    He is still a rookie, so fans will need to remember that he’s still learning how to employ those skills on every shift. In the first five games of the season, he has averaged only 14:21 per game, but 2:44 of that has been on the power play. He still needs to improve his defensive play, but his desire to be a difference maker at both the offensive and defensive end has been on display. 

    He is set in his position on the power play, doing his job in helping win the faceoff. Once he is set on the half wall, he is positioned to scan the entire ice surface. He quickly identifies that the pass from Laine will be cut off and quickly adjusts from offence to defence. He turns up ice and uses strong, long strides while cutting at an angle to reduce the distance to the puck carrier on the breakaway and build speed. He overtakes not only Dobson but also catches Foligno as he reaches the high slot. Most rookies would use their stick to hamper the puck carrier, or even take a penalty; instead, Demidov uses his body positioning to force Foligno to his backhand, then uses physical contact to gently separate the player from the puck. More plays like this will allow the coaching staff to trust him in any situation, allowing him to gain more ice time 

    Demidov is learning what it takes to compete at the NHL level. It isn’t just about systems or talent; it is mental, it is about confidence. His belief and ability to remain calm when he is in control of the puck give him an edge as he is not only capable of creating plays in the offensive zone, but also willing to make the attempt when most players would make the safest play or dump the puck into a corner. It is this poise that will allow him to accelerate his development and make him a favourite for the Calder Trophy in 2025-26. 

  • Gavin McKenna Headlines Top Prospects In the NCAA

    Gavin McKenna Headlines Top Prospects In the NCAA

    NCAA Draft Eligible Top Prospects Spotlight


    As hockey season begins in many leagues around North America, prospects eligible for
    the 2026 NHL Entry Draft look to put their best foot forward to start the year. Each month, we
    will cover each of the six players currently playing NCAA hockey and how they rank in this
    year’s draft. Here is the report from our first month, October:


    1: Gavin McKenna – LW, Penn State

    • No surprises here, as McKenna rightfully takes number one. The hype around him is
      real, and his abilities in the offensive zone could transform an NHL offense. I also love
      the decision to go to the NCAA from McKenna, as while his production will dip and he
      will struggle more often than he would in the WHL, it will pay off for him in the long run,
      as the NCAA has a great track record of development. He plays on a top line in the
      NCAA, playing over 21 minutes a night in his four games so far. He is trusted at a high
      level, and that is mainly due to his high-end offensive traits. He is quick, and his agility
      and lateral movement are excellent. He is best off the rush, using creative ways to work
      the puck into the slot and rip it into the net, or find a way to dish it to a teammate. His
      forecheck and defensive abilities need plenty of work, but that’s not why you draft him.
      His skill is just too high to pass up on in the offensive zone, and McKenna will likely be
      stapled to the number one spot on this list for the rest of the year, barring drastic
      changes.

    • 2: Keaton Verhoeff – RD, North Dakota
    • After an incredible year with the Victoria Royals, including 21 goals from the back end,
      Verhoeff decided to take his talents to North Dakota, something that will surely improve
      his development. He has great size at 6’4”, and uses it well for poke-checks and
      blocking zone-entries. He also collapses gaps incredibly quickly, most times using his
      size to pin an opposing player to the boards before the zone entry, and allows a
      teammate to retrieve the puck if he can’t do so himself. His biggest strength, however, is
      easily his shot. You don’t score 21 goals in the WHL as a 16-year-old defenseman with a
      sub-par shot, and Verhoeff is certainly no exception. He takes plenty of shots from the
      back-end, and when he has time to let one rip, there is a likely chance it hits twine. His
      first goal in a North Dakota uniform was just that, a rocket from behind the circles.
      Verhoeff isn’t perfect, though, and some of his inconsistencies bother me. First, his
      skating is not great. It isn’t a weakness necessarily, but he can at times be caught flat-
      footed and will flail trying to do quick crossovers to make up for it. He is a taller
      defenseman, so super smooth skating isn’t a dealbreaker, but it is noticeable. Second,
      he tends to be one of the first players to join the rush or head into the attacking zone.
      This is great for most offensive defenders, but that means he will likely need a defensive
      partner to balance him out, despite Verhoeff’s individual defense being solid. Those
      aren’t huge problems, but when you are projected as a future number one defender,
      small skating or defense issues will be amplified. One of the best things about Verhoeff,
      though, is his age. He is only 17 and has a July birthday, meaning by the time he turns
      18, he will have an entire NCAA season under his belt, one of the best development

    leagues, especially for defensemen. These issues I have with him may be entirely gone
    by the end of the season, or they may be his main issues. Verhoeff is definitely one to
    wait and see how he develops this year, but he will likely be a top-three pick in a loaded
    2026 class.
    3: Ilia Morozov** – C, Miami (OH)

    • Here is where we start branching out into lesser-known names; however, I doubt that will
      be true of Morozov for long. He has caught my eye so quickly that he will be the topic of
      the first prospect analysis article. Last year, he played for the Tri-City Storm of the
      USHL, putting up 11 goals and 22 points in 56 games, a good showing for the then 16-
      year-old. Now, at 17 with an August birthday, the incredibly young forward took the step
      up to the NCAA. As the youngest player in the league, he has made his presence known
      with 3 goals and 7 points in only four games for Miami Ohio. At 6’3”, he already has the
      size to be physical and protect the puck on his stick. He isn’t a player who excels with
      the puck on his stick, however. Almost any time his team enters the offensive zone,
      Morozov goes directly to the front of the net. But he is not inactive, constantly shifting or
      gliding behind the net to continue a cycle. He is not the best of the boards, but like
      Verhoeff, that makes sense with a 17-year-old in the NCAA, even if both are above 6
      feet. He has a quick release and specifically excels with his catch-and-release shot. He
      also has already shown a high motor at times, but he is inconsistent and will sometimes
      not push himself on a backcheck or forecheck. Not only is he inconsistent, but his
      skating is also an issue and he will need to improve if he wants to make the NHL.
      Overall, a fascinating package that could turn a lot of heads around hockey circles if he
      can continue to produce. He has already brought the Miami Ohio Hockey program to a
      better season than last year, as they have gone 4-0-0 to start the year, while they only
      won 3 games all of last year. If this young prospect can continue reviving an NCHC
      program as the top line center with great net-front skills, he may be a lot better than
      many know right now. I think at the very least he is a first-rounder, and if he continues to
      improve, he could creep into the top 15.

    • 4: Adam Valentini – LW, Michigan
    • Valentini has a lot of development ahead, but he could be really good if he can continue
      to grow his game. Another late-birthday 2008 (April), but chose to take the jump to the
      NCAA, and in 4 games already has 3 assists. You can see what made Valentini so good
      for the Chicago Steel last year, where he put up 17 goals and 39 points in 58 games, a
      very good performance in the USHL. Now at Michigan, you can see how his game is a
      bit less refined compared to others in the NCAA. But the skill level and talent are there;
      he just needs some fine-tuning. His small area skill is great; he can stickhandle quickly
      and in stride, he is a hound entering the zone, stick lifts and works around opponents,
      and tries to create a chance even when the play is seemingly broken up. But his
      defensive positioning, forechecking effort, and physical play all leave more to be desired.
      A lot of these issues can be worked out, and like all players on this list, it will be
      interesting to see how the coaching staff will develop him, especially one as good as

    Michigan’s. I think Valentini is also currently a first-round level prospect, and if he
    improves so should his draft stock.


    5: Landon Nycz – LD, Massachusetts

    • Landon Nycz is another player who I think is flying under the radar right now, but by draft
      day people will know who he is. Already logging around 15 minutes a night, he may only
      be the fifth option on the backend for the Minutemen, but he shows promise already. He
      has good size at 6’2”, and skates incredibly well for his size. His crossovers and
      transition skating is so fluid it looks second nature to Nycz. He normally begins the
      breakout for his team, can fake opponents in the defensive zone, and then find a seam
      pass to one side in the neutral zone to transition to offense. While he normally stays high
      to be the last man back, he will occasionally cycle in the offensive zone and drive
      towards the net to get a better chance. He also shoots the puck a ton, especially off
      feeds at the blue-line, resulting in Nycz’ first NCAA goal last week. He is noticeable
      responsible in the way he plays, and will battle net front to clear his crease. The lack of
      glaring issues is also a large plus for Nycz. He is already 18 as a October birthday, but
      to be a noticeable defenseman in the NCAA at 18 is no easy feat. I see him slotting into
      a second round pick come draft time, as his mix of skating, size, and high level of
      competition in the NCAA make him appealing. If he can keep up this pace this year, he
      is likely an early day two selection.

    • 6: Lincoln Kuehne – RD, Arizona State
    • Not a ton to say about Kuehne, although he is a notable prospect in his own right. He is
      a 6’2”, defense-first defenseman who is currently shoring up the bottom pair for Arizona
      State. He was at the United States National Development Program last year, where he
      put up 3 assists and a +8 rating in 27 games. He uses his size well, effectively
      eliminating rush chances against the boards. He closes gaps quickly and doesn’t give
      oncoming forwards any room. This is effective; however, higher-level forwards will be
      able to work around this method, so he will need to advance his defensive technique to
      get to the next level. He skates fairly well and uses it to reach pucks and close lanes
      quickly. He hasn’t put up any stats for ASU yet this year, but as a shutdown third-pair
      defenseman, no news means a job well done. I don’t know if Kuehne has a super high
      ceiling, but playing any role on a good ASU program in your draft year is a good sign.
      And if you want to develop a defenseman anywhere, it’s the NCAA. A big issue with him
      so far is his ice-time, as he currently ranks last on Arizona State with just over 11
      minutes a night on average. When you are playing less than most forwards as a
      defensemen, it may be cause for concern due to the lack of trust with the coach that
      shows. How he develops throughout the year will decide his draft ranking, as he has just
      not played enough at the NCAA level yet.

    It may be a little ridiculous to try and project where these players will go on draft night in
    nine months, but the exercise to more to express the level there are playing at over the course
    of the year. These 6 players all deserve a nod in some aspect, as playing college hockey in your

    draft year is impressive in itself. Im excited to keep covering them over the course of this year to
    see how they can grow their games, and where they do end up in the draft.

  • Vladislav Yermolenko

     2025-19-09 Niagara 1 @ Brampton 4 (OHL)

    Yermolenko’s defining trait is his hockey IQ. Every paths he takes in the crease seemed calculated and based on his reads. He consistently performed shoulder checks to identify threats in the zone, allowing him to plan his movements and arrive on angle without relying excessively on raw explosiveness. His glove hand was also impressive, catching pucks cleanly and without hesitation. That said, there are technical flaws in his game. His RVH seals are inconsistent, leaving gaps that shooters can exploit, which cost him a goal in this game. His T-pushes were also inefficient; rather than a clean, single push across the crease, he often used two smaller pushes, which slowed him down. Yermolenko’s intelligence will generate interest, but some of his mechanics could hold him back, as NHL teams place a premium on those skills. I’ll be following his development closely, as improvement in those areas could make him a more complete prospect.

  • Ryder Fetterolf

     2025-26-09 Ottawa 2 @ North Bay 1 (OHL)

    Fetterolf is a smaller goalie, but one who makes up for it with his overall fluidity while moving. His movements are crisp and decisive, whether skating on his feet or sliding in the butterfly. His speed in this viewing was above average, but he struggled with rebound control. Pucks often hit him hard, and he had difficulty absorbing them cleanly. He also tended to lose edge early and rely heavily on his butterfly. While this approach allowed him to seal the lower net effectively, it left him vulnerable on higher shots which is a particular concern given his smaller frame. Fetterolf will remain on my radar, but I’ll be looking for growth in his overall game to justify a mid-round projection in the 2026 draft.

  • Dmitri Borichev

     2025-26-09 Yaroslavl 1 @ Mamonty 2 (MHL)

    Borichev is a powerful goalie with a commanding presence in the crease. His lower-body strength makes him one of the most explosive goalies in this draft class. His first pushes,whether standing or from the butterfly, are extremely strong, allowing him to set quickly for shooters. His puck tracking projects as potentially elite, as he rarely lost sight of the puck. In this viewing, he handled rebounds and loose pucks cleanly, avoiding chaotic or desperate movements. However, his mechanics on recoveries and post-save movements need refinement. His speed to regain square positioning, upper-body structure, and hand placement while moving or sliding were inconsistent. These mechanical issues can be addressed with development and shouldn’t hold him back too much, especially if his tracking and rebound control remain in the elite tier.

  • Marek Skenlicka

     2025-20-09 Tri-City 3 @ Seattle 6 (WHL)

    Skenlicka is a goalie with a strong combination of size and speed. Using his 6-foot-4 frame to his advantage, he positions himself well and stays on angle with the puck. His speed is impressive for a goalie of his size. His pushes are crisp, and he transitions smoothly from RVH or butterfly into set positioning. That skill allows him to recover quickly after shots or broken plays in front of him. While his crease work was impressive overall, two concerns stood out. First, I felt he could have been more aggressive in his positioning. At times, he stayed too deep in the blue paint rather than challenging shooters. Given his size, squareness, and recovery ability, he has the tools to play more assertively. Second, he struggled with rebound control on low shots, leaving too many loose pucks in dangerous areas. To his credit, his strong tracking often allowed him to cover those rebounds quickly. With his size, technique, and speed, Skenlicka is one of the most intriguing goalie prospects for the 2026 draft.

  • Frantisek Poletin

     2025-12-09 Pelicans 5 @ Ilves U20 4 SO (U20 Finland)

    Poletin is a technically sound goalie who relies on positioning more than raw speed. He consistently stays on angle when tracking plays in the defensive zone and on rushes. He manages rebounds effectively, which limits the need for difficult recoveries. While his post-shot recoveries are technically well-executed, he lacks the explosiveness that could elevate his overall game. One area of concern is his upper-body work. His butterfly is tight and his low-shot tracking is strong, but he struggles more on high shots, especially glove side. His left hand tends to sit low and away from his body at knee height, which slows his reaction time. Poletin has many of the technical strengths to make him an intriguing 2026 draft option, but to rise in the rankings he will need to show more quickness and refine his tracking on higher shots.

  • Danai Shaiikov

     2025-19-09 Gatineau 5 @ Val-d’Or 3 (QMJHL)

    Shaiikov, a DY+1 goalie prospect, was a player I was eager to watch since his arrival in North America, and he did not disappoint. His speed immediately stood out. Quick on his feet, he covers ground well within his crease, and in this viewing his recovery skills looked elite. His quickness allowed him to reset his angles after the first shot with ease. Shaiikov is also a very active goalie who likes to challenge shooters. His feet and hands are constantly moving, whether he is upright or in the butterfly. However, that aggressiveness and constant activity sometimes left him vulnerable, as he occasionally lost control of his angles and seals, leading to goals against. In my opinion, with consistency this year, he could generate interest from NHL scouts. With his speed and quickness, he has the tools to be a candidate as an overager for the 2026 draft.

  • Vladimir Selivanov

     2025-19-09 Dynamo Moscow 1 @ MHK Spartak 3 (MHL)

    Selivanov is a goalie who blends strong technique with athleticism. He generates excellent power on his pushes, allowing him to arrive on angle and challenge shooters effectively. He rarely sets up late or off-balance. His positioning and puck tracking are both excellent, and he follows pucks into his body closely, making him very difficult to beat without a screen or lateral movement. However, I noticed a decline in focus and consistency when defensive-zone sequences dragged on and fatigue set in. At that point, Selivanov began giving up more dangerous rebounds and looked less sharp on recoveries. That being said, his overall skill set is nearly complete, and he should be considered among the early favorites to top preliminary goalie lists for the 2026 NHL Draft.

  • Ethan Belchetz Game Report vs Niagara IceDogs

    #61 LW Ethan Belchetz, Windsor Spitfires (OHL), 6’5” 226lbs, L, DOB 03.30.2008

    Belchetz was a dominant physical and offensive presence in Windsor’s win over Niagara, leveraging his size and strength to control possession and create scoring chances. The 6’5” winger played with confidence and purpose, using his frame to protect the puck and dictate play down low.

    Belchetz’s skating looked balanced and efficient but not explosive, he managed his pace well and used good turns along the boards to maintain possession and separate from defenders. His strong puck control allowed him to hold onto the puck in traffic and make solid, well-timed passes, including a crisp saucer pass through the slot to create a prime scoring chance. He was impactful on the power play, where his combination of size, puck skills, and shooting ability stood out. Positioned in and around the slot, he showcased a powerful and accurate wrist shot, capping off his performance with a highlight-reel goal, he got a perfect pass that sent him on a breakaway and he buried a beautiful wrist shot under the goalie’s blocker. Defensively, he showed good work down low and contributed to winning puck battles along the walls. His net-front presence added value on the power play, as he effectively screened the goalie and got rebounds. His physicality was evident all night. He leaned on defenders, played with strength, and didn’t shy away from contact. He continues to prove himself as a power forward with a complete offensive toolkit. His ability to combine size, skill, and finishing touch makes him a matchup problem for defenders. Belchetz’s performance against Niagara highlighted his strengths, net-front dominance, puck protection, and a lethal wrist shot. While his speed is average, his stride efficiency and hockey sense allow him to remain effective at both ends of the ice. With continued consistency and engagement, Belchetz projects as a top-six power forward capable of producing offence and setting the tone physically. Projects as a top 6 winger who can thrive on the power play as a net-front finisher

    Skater Category Summarization

    Skating: 7

    Speed/Pace: 7 

    Puck Skill: 7

    Scoring Ability: 7.5 

    Playmaking Ability: 7 

    Hockey Sense/IQ: 6.5

    Character: 6

    Physicality: 8

    Defensive Play: 6